For at least a decade, President Donald Trump has denounced U.S. efforts to change the regimes of foreign countries around the world.
But in February, when a reporter asked Trump if he wanted regime change in Iran, the president pivoted: “Well, it seems like that would be the best thing that could happen.”
Two weeks later, on Feb. 28, the U.S. joined Israel to attack Iran, and Trump called on Iranians to overthrow their government. It came about two months after the U.S. captured Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro by force.
For some of the president’s critics, Trump’s comments reveal he reversed his longtime position against regime change. In 2019, for example, he said during a campaign rally in Mississippi that “our policy of never-ending war, regime change, and nation-building is being replaced by the clear-eyed pursuit of American interests.”
PolitiFact uses a Flip-O-Meter to measure politicians’ consistency on issues. The rating is not a value judgment. Some people say changing positions shows inconsistent principles; others say it shows pragmatism and willingness to compromise given new information.
When we asked the White House about Trump’s position on regime change, a spokesperson referred us to Trump’s outline of his goals for Iran, including destroying Iran’s missile capabilities, annihilating its navy and preventing it from obtaining a nuclear weapon.
In 2016 Trump campaigned against regime change
During his 2016 presidential campaign, Trump repeatedly criticized his campaign rival, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and then-President Barack Obama for pursuing regime change. Trump called the Democrats’ strategy a “disaster.”
“We must abandon the failed policy of nation-building and regime change that Hillary Clinton pushed in Iraq, in Libya, in Egypt and in Syria,” Trump said during the 2016 Republican convention.
That September, he vowed to avoid pursuing foreign regime change.
“We’re going to stop the reckless and costly policy of regime change overseas, and instead, focus on working in partnership with our allies or a military campaign to utterly destroy ISIS,” Trump said in a Florida speechless than two months before winning the election.
Trump said he opposed regime change during his first term
In 2018, Trump withdrew from the Iran nuclear deal that Obama had struck with Iran and five other nations in which Iran agreed not to pursue nuclear weapons and allow monitoring of its compliance.
The next year, he said he wanted to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons but did not call for a change in the country’s leadership.
“We’re not looking for regime change,” Trump said in May 2019. “I just want to make that clear. We’re looking for no nuclear weapons.”
He continued to criticize his predecessors, saying that previous administrations’ “lust for regime change.”
“We’re not looking for regime change,” Trump said in August 2019 while speaking about Iran. “You’ve seen how that works over the last 20 years.”
In November 2019, Trump told the crowd in Mississippi his administration was focused on domestic policy.
“After years of building up foreign nations, we are finally building up our nation,” Trump said in the speech, which his critics recently circulated online. “We are finally putting America first. Our policy of never-ending war, regime change, and nation-building is being replaced by the clear-eyed pursuit of American interests.”
After the U.S. killed Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani in January 2020, Trump still publicly disavowed regime change.
“We do not seek regime change,” he said. “However, the Iranian regime’s aggression in the region, including the use of proxy fighters to destabilize its neighbors, must end, and it must end now.”
During the 2020 campaign, Trump did not speak about “regime change” as much as he did in 2016.
Trump continued to oppose regime change in his 2024 campaign, saying he didn’t want “senseless wars.”
Trump said regime change could lead to chaos in 2025
Trump floated the idea of supporting regime change in June 2025, after the U.S. struck three nuclear sites in Iran. Trump wrote on Truth Social: “It’s not politically correct to use the term, ‘Regime Change,’ but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn’t there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!”
But then he walked it back. A couple days later, a reporter asked him if he wanted regime change in Iran.
“Well, if there was, there was, but no, I don’t want it,” Trump said. “I’d like to see everything calm down as quickly as possible. Regime change takes chaos and, ideally, we don’t want to see so much chaos.”
2026: Trump administration, allies offer conflicting remarks on regime change
After the Feb. 28 strikes on Iran, Trump and his allies stated different takes on whether regime change was a goal of Operation Epic Fury.
The military operation against Iran killed the country’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei along with dozens of other officials, and struck 1,000 targets in the first 24 hours, U.S. military officials said. Iran launched retaliatory strikes on U.S. embassies and several Arab states.
In his first remarks after the attackTrump addressed the people of Iran: “When we are finished, take over your government. It will be yours to take. This will be probably your only chance for generations.”
Trump told The New York Times on March 1 that one option was an outcome similar to Venezuela, in which only the top leader was removed but much of the rest of the government remained in place and was willing to work with the U.S. He told the Times that he had “three very good choices” about who could lead Iran. On the evening of March 1, Trump told ABC News that the possible candidates he had in mind were killed in the attack.
But he also described a scenario in which the Iranian people would overthrow the government, the opposite of the Venezuela model. “That’s going to be up to them about whether or not they do,” Trump said.
U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said March 2, “This is not a so-called regime change war, but the regime sure did change and the world is better off for it.”
That same day, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the U.S. operation’s objective was to block Iran’s weapons access. Yet he also called for new leadership.
“We would love to see this regime be replaced,” Rubio said, adding that Trump “would love for the people of Iran to use this as an opportunity to rise up and remove these leaders.”
Our ruling
Trump has changed his rhetoric about U.S. involvement in foreign regime change.
In 2016 while campaigning, Trump called for abandoning what he said was a failed policy of regime change.
During his first term, Trump repeatedly said that he sought to prevent a nuclear Iran but did not seek regime change. In 2024, he said it was not the role of the U.S. military “to wage endless regime change, wars.”
After the U.S. struck nuclear sites in 2025, Trump floated the idea of Iran regime change in a Truth Social post but when asked about it he took a dim view saying regime change creates chaos.
After the U.S. and Israel attacked Iran Feb. 28 and killed Iran’s top leaders, Trump told the people of Iran to take over their government. But in other remarks, he said objectives included dismantling Iran’s weapon capabilities and did not mention regime change.
Trump has been inconsistent on regime change, and overall he has shifted from being critical of the idea for years to describing it as a possibility to following through by removing Iran’s leadership and calling on its people to overthrow their government.
We rate this a Full Flop.
RELATED: Could Iran ‘soon’ hit US with long-range missile? Experts doubt Trump as US bombs Iran.
RELATED: US attacks in Iran prompt renewed push in Congress over war powers
